Preacher man Dan

"Prove all things..." 1Thess 5:21

Placeholder Picture

Discover anew Christ who indwells you

Science vs the Bible

by Daniel J.M. Galpin

Consider what is told to you, evaluate what is true and believe the truth! Below are two stories: one is said to be Science the other Religion; one is said to be fact, the other fable. Consider both, believe the truth!

Science Bible
We are told findings are based on science and discovery proves their claims true. Consider the following and ask yourself if science has proven reliable regarding our origins? We are told believing the Bible is based on blind faith and that it cannot be proven true. Consider the following and ask yourself if the Bible is a reliable source for our origins?
We have be told we came to be billions of years ago, which all started with a big bang. We have be told humans have evolved from this. We are told facts have been presented to support many of these claims, therefore the parts they cannot prove, are to be believed because of the facts they have proven. At this point there appears to be logic. The Bible makes many historical and scientific claims regarding our origins. We can test these claims with historical sources outside the Bible, archaeology, and scientific testing. If the facts hold true, then we can logically concluded the Bible can be trust in other areas where it cannot be proven true and we can believe it as a whole.
Yet over time the “facts” they told have been proven wrong time and time again and they still tell us to believe their new “facts” as facts because they are in discovery. If I told you a story and over time my story was proven wrong; I then changed my story due to new “facts” I discovered, then those to were proven wrong, and this happen repeatedly over my lifetime, would I have any creditability? Of course not! Repeatedly facts in the Bible have been proven over time. Cities the Bible claims existed were found by archaeologist; the earth's circumference was recorded by Isaiah, Isa. 40:22, 700 BC, 300 years before Socrates, 400 BC, while most Pre-Socrates believed in a flat earth; kinds breed within a kind not outside a kind Gen 1:11-12, 21, 24-25, supporting DNA. The list could easily continue and gives creditability to the Bible.(1Tim 2:14)

Why then is the “science” of origins called science when they are merely guessing at it and discovering anew they are wrong and guessing again only to be wrong again? This is blind faith not science! So why is the Bible's account of origins considered wrong, when on countless occasions the Bible can be proven correct? Heb 11:3 "(3) Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear." Why is it not believed? Luke 16:30-31 "(30) And he said, Nay, father Abraham: but if one went unto them from the dead, they will repent.(31) And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead."

One can take this same principle to compare world religions: there are many beliefs, but only one truth! This paper is not written to support and show all the claims of science, world religion and the Bible, nor debate such, rather I focused on the core of the issue: test and see where the true lays rather then blinding believing any religion or so called “science” for that matter. The fact we cannot test for God's existence does not prove He does not exist when there is an abundance of evidence to prove He does exist. Rom 1:20 "(20) For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:"

For more evidence regarding the science of creation, visit Institute Creation Research and Answers in Genesis